So this week is shaping up well, with the "Zuck" leading the news with a dreamy $28B personal stake in Facebook if things go according to plan. Does he deserve it? You decide...though your opinion does not really matter unless you can influence Facebook's stock price in some way. Regardless, it's nice to see such positive news added to a steady stream of solid economic indicators.
Also in the news this week, the Fisker "Karma", my dream car, is finally getting a little respect in the market place with a review on CNN. Ok...it's a little excessive in some ways, but I don't think that anyone could not like this car. It's a great environmentally responsible piece of engineering, including its humanely raised and environmentally friendly processed leather seats. (Sorry PETA...we're getting there) What is most interesting is the way that this particular reviewer mentions that the Fisker Karma "Matchbox" car has been sitting on his desk for a long time, and he was finally able to drive it. Did Fisker send him the Matchbox car? If so....it was an ingenious marketing ploy aimed at associating their new car with playful fun, expectation, and then finally gratification.
I read an interesting snippet in Wired Magazine about self guided bullets today. Although I'm not convinced that this is something that the world needs, or that it will solve more than the chaos that it may create, it did immediately bring to mind the idea of mentoring. Odd you say? Hmmm....maybe not so much.
A self guided bullet knows where it's going and adjusts its direction by following a focused lazer beam that is on the target. Mentoring is the act of providing guidance to an individual, much like a lazer beam, showing the mentee where they should be going and how to get there. The result is that the person is able to achieve their goals sooner, and much more effeciently.
Wisdom and experience has its advantages, and it should be applied at every opportunity. Onboarding new talent, guiding new managers, or helping to prepare an executive to take over the helm of an organzation are just a few examples.
There are weeks that I look at what I have accomplished, and realize that it's time to adjust my route to the desired destination. As an example, I have been working on product strategy, marketing and sales planning, in addition to taking care of the core business tasks. Most of my time was spent doing what I thought was important, but it yielded very little in terms of the ideal outcomes.
Despite my misguided focus, I actually learned quite a bit. I learned that I need to do more competitive research, talk to more customers, and ensure that we're using the right tools to determine our direction. Peter Drucker , a management thought leader that I hold in high regard, had some powerful questions that help me stay on track in terms of focus and direction.
1. What is our mission?
2. Who is our customer?
3. What does the customer value?
4. What are our results?
5. What is our plan?
Since I have to tackle these issues as a lean organization, rather than a company with the resources available to it like IBM or Boeing, both of which made headlines this week, I need to focus on what is manageable and realistic. Lean Startup principles will be applied. We know what our mission is and think we know what the other answers are. But I will absolutely be taking a deeper look at questions 2 through 5 as I work with our existing customers, and a few future customers.
Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger conducted research that lead to the 70/20/10 learning model. The model states that 70% of your learning should come from hands on tasks and real life problem solving. 20% of your experience should come from feedback and observing good and bad examples. And finally, 10% should come from courses and learning.
The world of learning and development has progressed significantly in terms of adopting this model, and Kahn Academy is helping. It's not just because they are making the 10% of the learning process, courses, readily available on a variety of topics. It's because they have shown how easy it is to make this information available at such a low cost. A simple youtube video at the hands of a good teacher, combined with a searchable and indexed format in which to post the educational content, results in a small investment making a huge impact.
Combine these great videos with the latest in audio to text translation tools, or audio search tools, and the sky is the limit.
Microsoft and others have been providing these types of tools for a long time, and like Kahn Academy, are always incorporating more hands on tools to cover the 70/20. But there is so much room for improvement, innovation and growth. I expect to see the education, learning and development market change dramatically over the next few years. The result will be incumbent businesses disappearing in the wake of those that take the lead as innovators, old or new.
As for the learning environments, I predict that more online tools will play a key role connecting people to hands on tasks for businesses and non profits, as well as mentors that can provide valuable feedback.
Innovation seems to be sprinkled into most business and product discussions these days. It’s expected, particularly in an economy that is driven by global competition, the ability of competitors to duplicate products rapidly, price wars, and trying to get and keep the attention of the 7 billion prospective customers that are roaming the earth. Another reason it’s hot, is that entire industries and businesses have been wiped out, or have the potential to be wiped out by innovations. A quick look at the recent history of Borders bookstore, Blockbuster video, or even Eli Lilly’s loss of the patent for Zyprexa, and it’s clear that innovations can change the universe, and effectively crush businesses that are not able to stay ahead of the product curve.
Amazon.com, iTunes.com and even Netflix.com showed how innovation can change the world, and simultaneously stamp the life out of the incumbent businesses. Although I have to mention that execution still counts, because Netflix and Bank of America seem to have forgotten that customers are neither stupid nor patient when it comes to how they are treated. We’ll see how that turns out. The point is that innovation is important.
Innovation does not just happen in startups, hence the mention of Eli Lilly. Innovation is what created Zyprexa, their top selling anti-psychotic drug. Startups do tend to be better at creating new products because they are not caught up in the day to day operations that keep them from thinking more creatively. That’s why the Eli Lilly’s of the world like to acquire innovations that were created by startups. These large organizations are embracing it though, and I expect to see a lot more highly structured innovation teams living within their walls. The benefits, such as owning patents, minimizing costs, and maximizing profits, are too great for them not to at least try. Patent troll firms like Intellectual Ventures are driving a different type of behavior in the market by buying patents from inventors, and using questionable tactics to extract money from people that use the technologies. This will undoubtedly drive similar behavior by other businesses just to stay competitive. My gut tells me that this will benefit very few, and the rest of the market will suffer for it. That’s a subject for another day.